TALKS | Systems for equity, collectivism, co-design and citizen movements

Collaboration Competencies for Complex Social Challenges

Goran Matic, Chaordic Design, Canada

Read the working paper ⇒

This paper outlines some of the key findings from an MDes Master Research Project (MRP) thesis. It explores potentials of collaborating in the context of complex societal issues – that exist at the intersection of ‘wicked problems’ (Rittel & Webber, 1973), ‘problematiques’ (Christakis, 2006), ‘social messes’ (Ackoff, 1974; Horn & Weber, 2007), ‘super–wicked problems’ (Levin et al., 2012) and the more recently postulated, ‘post–modern complexity’ (Cilliers, 2002). The paper argues that the outlined categories of issue complexity belong to a larger unified typology, termed as ‘complex social challenges’ (Matic, 2017) – characterized by intrinsic asymmetries that give rise to the cognitive, contextual and cooperative ambiguities. Within such spaces, it is posited as necessary to consider the experiences of the key stakeholders from the liminal (Turner, 1995; Gennep, 1960) and salutogenic sense‐of‐coherence (Antonovsky, 1996) perspectives – in order to enhance the sustainability of the associated participatory engagement models. A new type of collaboration is proposed for effectively engaging complex challenges, posited as a ‘collaboration for complexity’. The new collaborative modality calls for specific meta-cognitive competencies capable of effectively engaging the exigent ambiguities. A typology of collaborative skillsets is presented – situated in a posited stakeholder journey through the uncertain spaces of liminality. An example use‐case involving stakeholders in a real–life complex social challenge is used to demonstrate potential applicability in practical design settings.

References

Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future: A systems approach to societal problems. Wiley.
Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11
Christakis, A. N. (2006). A Retrospective Structural Inquiry of the Predicament of Humankind. In J. P. van Gigch & J. McIntyre-Mills (Eds.), Volume 1: Rescuing the Enlightenment from Itself: Critical and Systemic Implications for Democracy (pp. 93–122). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27589-4_7
Cilliers, P. (2002). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012253
Gennep, A. van. (1960). The Rites of Passage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315017594
Horn, R. E. and Weber, R. P. (2007). New Tools For Resolving Wicked Problems: Mess Mapping and Resolution Mapping Processes.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
Matic, G. (2017). Collaboration for Complexity – Team Competencies for Engaging Complex Social Challenges.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Turner, V. (1995). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Transaction Publishers.